![]() |
|
The
Women's Health Initiative Study
The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) is a 15-year study of ways to prevent
heart disease, breast and colorectal cancer, and osteoporosis. WHI, which
consists of a set of clinical trials and an observational study, began in
1991 and involves more than 161,000 healthy postmenopausal women. WHI is
sponsored by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in collaboration
with other units of the National Institutes of Health.
One of the clinical studies involved 16,608 women with a uterus who took either estrogen plus progestin therapy (specifically, Prempro™, manufactured by Wyeth) or a placebo (a substance that looks like the real drug but has no biologic effect). The main goal was to see if the therapy would help prevent heart disease and hip fractures. Another goal was to see if those possible benefits were greater than the possible risks for breast cancer, endometrial cancer, and blood clots. Another arm of the WHI studied estrogen only. That arm of the study continues. However, the first study was halted on July 9, 2002, after 5.2 years, because the NHBLI determined that the risks to those participating in the study outweighed the benefits. While the study did determine some benefits to the estrogen plus progestin regimen; in that is reduced the risk of colorectal cancer and bone fractures, other results were disheartening. The study revealed that not only did the therapy not protect against heart diseases, but actually increased the chance of heart attacks, blood clots and strokes. The study was specifically stopped because the estrogen/progestin therapy resulted in a 26% increase in breast cancer. It also resulted in:
If you or a loved one took Prempro, Premarin or another hormone replacement
therapy and have breast cancer, blood clots, stroke, heart disease or
other complications, click here
to have an attorney evaluate your case for free, with no obligation. Or,
call toll free, 877.786.1LAW (1529).
Any information you submit is kept private and confidential and is used
for the sole purpose of evaluating your potential case. |
Site Menu
About Us What
Is Hormone (Replacement) Therapy? -
Overview- Benefits of HRT - Dangerous Side Effects of HRT - Conclusions Prempro / Premarin Women's Health Initiative Study Potential Litigation Contact Us Home
Other Injury Law Related Sites
VanDerGinst
Law Baycol
Nursing
Home Abuse & Neglect Welding
Rod Slip
& Fall AccidentsNational Legal Resources
State Legal Resources Other HRT Law Resources
Hormone
Hysteria American
Medical Women's Association Medline
Plus Council
on Hormone Education Imaginis
FDA
to reassess hormone replacement risks A
High Price for HRT NIH
News Release |
| ©2004 VanDerGinst Law and MegaHunter, Inc. - Prempro Class Action Attorneys and Premarin Side Effects Lawsuit Lawyers serving the United States. All Rights Reserved. MegaSites by MegaHunter - Site Disclaimer |
|
| Prempro Class Action Lawyer Website Disclaimer:
The prempro class action lawsuit, premarin side effects, provera injury, mass tort drug
litigation and/or other legal information offered herein by VanDerGinst
Law is not formal legal advice nor the formation of an attorney client relationship.
Our law firm handles law suits . Any results set forth here were dependent
on the facts of that case and the results will differ from case to case.
Please contact a premarin lawsuit attorney for advice on your rights.
The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements or self-proclaimed expertise. This disclosure is required by the Supreme Court of Iowa. Memberships and offices in legal fraternities and legal societies, technical and professional licenses, and memberships in scientific, technical and professional associations and societies of law or field of practice do not mean that a lawyer is a specialist or expert in a field of law nor do they mean that such a lawyer is necessarily any more expert or competent than any other lawyer. All potential clients are urged to make their own independent investigation and evaluation of any lawyer being considered. This notice is required by the rule of the Supreme Court of Iowa." See Iowa Code of Professional Responsibility OR 2-101(A), OR 2-101(C), OR 2-105(A)(3)(c) (1997). |